24 September 2008

Grammar misconceptions

1. You CAN split an infinitive.

To boldly go where no man has gone before

...is fine. Some argue that because the infinitive form of a verb is a single word in Latin, but is two words in English (to go) you should not put anything between those two words. No authority for 200 years has agreed with this argument, although some suggest that it is more elegant to avoid splitting the infinitive. Best of all find a more expressive verb than go, and that way you can do without the boldly and avoid the issue altogether.

2. You CAN start a sentence with and or but. Shakespeare did it, so why not you?

But soft! What light through yonder window breaks?


3. You CAN end a sentence with a preposition. Prepositions include with, for, to, after. Some argue (wrongly) that they are used to join nouns and so they cannot come at the end of a sentence. Occasionally it can be more elegant to avoid ending with a preposition, but usually you just end up with pompous or old-fashioned writing.

The things we have to put up with.

The things up with which we have to put.

Labels:

9 September 2008

Automatic spin spotting

A web add-on that spots spin in news stories was launched yesterday to make the media more transparent, its developers say.

Spin Spotter in action

The New York Times reported that Spin Spotter will soon be enhanced to compare copy with the original press release.

Don't be too scared. It doesn't currently think that the 10 Downing Street website contains any spin. Could be a useful tool, though, if they get it working.

Labels: ,

1 September 2008

Fewer: the shocking truth

Tesco is changing its signs from ten items or less to up to ten items because of complaints from grammar activists according to UPI.

Pretty scary thought, eh, those grammar activists?

Definitely and absolutely a grammatical error. It should read 10 items or fewer

The Telegraph quoted a Tesco spokesman saying
The debate about what is right has been going on for years now, and I still don't think we know if 'less' or 'fewer' is correct.

Other news sources, including the BBC, implied that there was some doubt about whether the original signs were grammatically incorrect.

Let's set the record straight here and now:

Less if it is uncountable (less jelly, less custard)

Fewer if it is countable (fewer jelly babies, fewer custard creams... fewer items).

On this one, there is no doubt.

Labels: